ShareThis

Translate to ...... with one click.

CURRENT EVENTS:


Dec.2014 LauraHillenbrand FaceTheNation
ME+Unbroken Interview HERE -

AND
Dec 2014 ~ "NIH"P2P4ME"

NIH="InsufficientResearch"=DUH !
Treatment= more"SELF Management"
DraftReport HERE
AND
Nov.2014- "Plague"-Published !!
VOA-PodcastAudioInterview HERE
Hardcover+Kindle+AudioBook
Amazon USA Link HERE









Sunday, September 19, 2010

#79~ CFSAC Letter Time~ "Crimes and Dimes"

Kathryn has given me permission to post her letter to this blog for your education......
**************************

   For printing and dissemination at CFSAC Oct. 12-14, 2010:


   Dear Committee Members, President Barack Obama, Sec. Kathleen
   Sebelius, DHHS, and Director Collins, NIH, and Senate HELP Committee


   CRIMES AND DIMES

 
   The NIH and CDC have willfully and criminally ignored their mandates and over 5,000 scientific studies of patients with CFS, which was originally M.E. (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis), which they intentionally mis-named in order to cover-up sporadic outbreaks of ME. This was done for at least two reasons:  First,  CFS/ME arose as HIV/AIDS was killing people and the CDC could not mentally manage a parallel infectious disease that the public would learn about and demand answers. The CDC had the mental problem, not us patients. 


Secondly, the CDC also knew how disabling ME could be, making more people eligible for medical care and disability benefits along with the burgeoning list of HIV/AIDS patients. Their disregard of our care must have been sanctioned by very powerful, higher echelon government agencies (NIH?, DHHS?); I don't believe they could have done this without it.

   These inhumane violations of our civil right to disability benefits, appropriate testing and treatment trials has meant 30 years of possibly criminal neglect of the American people. They have violated their own mandates to research and define CFS in a scientific and responsible manner.


   Now Reeves has been transferred...so what!? He is still publishing garbage based on his erroneous, misleading "Empirical Definition" on almost a weekly basis, and getting away with it. Who are the scientific, clinical peer-reviewers of the psychobabble he gets away with; what are their inherent interests in perpetuating the myths of child abuse, psychological problems and lack of neurological and immune system symptoms in this devastating disease?


    NIAID is setting up multi-centered clinical trials. The Question of NIH Director Collins assured patients at the recent XMRV conference of Sept. 8-9, 2010, that "we are on track. Things will happen." The QUESTION of the Day is: Based on WHAT DEFINITION? The CDC's depressed or wrongly diagnosed GA cohort, selected by random phone calls? 

The Canadian Consensus on ME/CFS? 
The 1994 Fukuda definition? 
Only one is acceptable: 
The Canadian Consensus.
 
   At the same meeting, Dr. Gottesman, Dep. Dir., Intra-Mural Research, NIH, said there will be more funding and more publications, explaining there was a "lack of concrete scientific, clinical and medical findings and published papers" .... does he SELECT OUT the 5,000 CFS publications, or is he just as ignorant as the CDC's scientists? Is he also blind or willfully ignorant? He was clueless out the patient's abhorrence of Strauss and Fauci's past actions towards us, so he obviously has never read Hilary Johnson's "Osler's Web", either. This brilliant history of the CFS criminal saga should be required reading for everyone from President Obama, to Secretary Sebelius, Director Collins,  Director Friedan (CDC) and whomever gets the new post as head of the CDC's CFS research
program, before any more damage is done to us.

 
   Gottesman did say that the "Alter/Lo publication will change everything for our illness." Maybe we could start by getting the dentists and psychiatrists now on the CFS research grants team replaced immediately.  

Dr. Peterson was at this meeting, and informed Dr. Gottesman that the major researchers of CFS are not getting funding. The patients in attendance there stated the research grants process for CFS is flawed and needed fixing.  There are four research teams that I know of that could be funded immediately: Dr. Nancy Klimas, Dr. Ila Singh, Dr. Paul Cheney and the Whittemore Peterson Institute. The PANDORA organization needs funding for the already approved New Jersey Center of Excellence. It's needs to be built at once, with clinical trials for treatment of the myriad diseases of th NeuroEndocrineImmune spectrum, including CFS, FM, GWI, Autism, atypical MS, among others. Then we need at least six or more, so patients don't have to kill themselves just getting to one for evaluation and treatments.
 
   DIMES have been spend on CFS, or should I say misspent? We demand the NIH release at least $100M over the next YEAR, to forward the research into the third Retrovirus found to infect mankind. XMRV/MLVs may not be the primary cause, but retroviruses have not been found to be benign and its association with CFS is no longer in doubt, no matter where it came from, no matter that not everyone positive for it is not
(yet) sick.

 
   The CDC has spent about $3 per patient per year on CFS. This is unconscionable for a disease far more prevalent than MS, for one, and just as disabling to certain patients as HIV in their last few months of life.

 
   The dimes need to be exchanged for dollars now...lots of them!

 
    The crimes against humanity must stop. Real science, real research, real clinical trials, and real treatments must begin. Start with the
XMRV positive patients, and retest often those sick but testing negative. Just click on 
"Start"!  CLINICAL TRIALS NOW!
 
   Remove the CDC from all CFS related programs; they must be at the NIH's NAIAD division, immediately.

 
   Strong measures must be taken to protect the nation's blood supply; not questions eliciting whether a patient feels 'unwell' at the time.

 
   Let's trade CRIMES for TRUST
   Let's trade DIMES for DOLLARS

 
   Let's do it together. NOW IS THE TIME.
   From: We Three in One Home; All with CFS/ME
   Kathryn Stephens
   Mary L Arispe
   Kathy L. Lorentz

******************************************************





Thank You Kathryn for sharing your letter with all of us..
I agree with Everything you state.. We all know it to be true..
If not now ~ WHEN ???
We have been ignored like my dead car battery...


Support Our Troops? Gee... WHOM do you think has been receiving
the MOST blood transfusions with this tainted blood and they have
been accused that their Gulf War Syndrome is "all in their heads."
Our Best and Brightest.. Now you know how WE feel.....
STOP the Progress of all of the immune illnesses and cancers
that these Retroviruses are allowing to invade our bodies..


CDC ~ Center for Disease Control... Poppycock...
More like "Can't Detect Crap" even after they were SENT +Positive
sample strains of XMRV ... 
You can't find a Peach Pit in an Orange... and That is EXACTLY
what the CDC has been doing by using the WRONG Definition 
all of these years we have been suffering.....

They did INDEED Purposely IGNORE all of the Evidence ever since
the beginning.. and this is INDEED a CRIME against Humanity !!!
If XMRV is SO harmless... maybe they would like to be injected with 
the tainted blood and then let's SEE if it's all in their Heads ??

If you would like your letter to be printed just let me know..
I am hoping this will HELP inform and educate the many that
are unable to watch the CFSAC meetings and yet KNOW what
they have been told by the TOO-LONG Suffering Patients..

Saturday, September 18, 2010

#78~ Dr Judy in Spain's "AIDS Review"-abstract only

For the FULL article you much purchase the the pdf at this site:
But here is the abstract that they put out to the public...


Distribution of Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Virus (XMRV) Infection in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Prostate Cancer
Judy A. Mikovits, Ying Huang, Max A. Pfost, Vincent C. Lombardi, Daniel C. Bertolette, Kathryn S. Hagen and Francis W. Ruscetti |Full Article in PDF|
Whittemore-Peterson Institute for Neuroimmune Diseases, University of Nevada, Reno NV, USA
 
    
 
   
 Abstract 
In 2006, sequences described as xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) were discovered in prostate cancer patients. In October 2009, we published the first direct isolation of infectious XMRV from humans and the detection of infectious XMRV in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In that study, a combination of classic retroviral methods were used including: DNA polymerase chain reaction and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for gag and env, full length genomic sequencing, immunoblotting for viral protein expression in activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, passage of infectious virus in both plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells to indicator cell lines, and detection of antibodies to XMRV in plasma. A combination of these methods has since allowed us to confirm infection by XMRV in 85% of the 101 patients that were originally studied. Since 2009, seven studies, predominantly using DNA polymerase chain reaction of blood products or tumor tissue, have reported failures to detect XMRV infection in patients with either prostate cancer or chronic fatigue syndrome. A review of the current literature on XMRV supports the importance of applying multiple independent techniques in order to determine the presence of this virus. Detection methods based upon the biological and molecular amplification of XMRV, which is usually present at low levels in unstimulated blood cells and plasma, are more sensitive than assays for the virus by DNA polymerase chain reaction of unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. When we examined patient blood samples that had originally tested negative by DNA polymerase chain reaction by more sensitive methods, we observed that they were infected with XMRV; thus, the DNA polymerase chain reaction tests provided false negative results. Therefore, we conclude that molecular analyses using DNA from unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells or from whole blood are not yet sufficient as stand-alone assays for the identification of XMRV-infected individuals. Complementary methods are reviewed, that if rigorously followed, will likely show a more accurate snapshot of the actual distribution of XMRV infection in humans.

To purchase the FULL article pdf:
http://www.aidsreviews.com/buyarticle.asp?articulo=1098

Thursday, September 9, 2010

#77~ SUMMARY of MEETING: NIH OFFICIALS + CFS Patients + Families, SEPT 7, 2010


The webcast of the 2day 1st ever XMRV International Workshop hosted by the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland will be online in a few days..maybe next week...

In the meantime, I thought you might enjoy hearing about a meeting just prior to the official workshop starting....

SUMMARY OF MEETING WITH NIH OFFICIALS AND CFS PATIENTS AND FAMILIES. SEPT 7, 2010

By Rivka Solomon, with help from Robert Miller  Contact: Robert Miller

On September 7, 2010, at 11 a.m., at the NIH campus in Bethesda, MD, a group of 9 CFS patients and their families met with high-up NIH officials. To my knowledge, this is the first meeting of its kind in the 27 years since I was first struck down with this illness in 1983. 

The meeting was organized by long-time CFS patient Robert Miller. The meeting's CFS participants (patients and family) included: Charlotte, Linda, Sherry, Scott, Marielle, Bobbi, Rivka, Robert and Megan. A wonderful surprise addition to the meeting was Dr. Dan Peterson, of Incline Village, NV, champion doctor of CFS patients and co-founder of the Whittemore Peterson Institute in Reno, NV. The meeting was held just prior to the start of the 1st International XMRV Conference sponsored by the NIH. The NIH officials present included: 

•   Michael Gottesman, M.D. ~  
Chief of NCI's Laboratory of Cell Biology and Director of the NIH Office of Intramural Research     
http://www.nih.gov/about/almanac/historical/deputy_directors.htm#gottesman
email= plotzp@ mail.nih.gov

•   Roland Owens, Ph.D~        
Assistant Director of the NIH Office of Intramural Research and Chief of the Molecular Biology Section in the Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology in the National  Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases at NIH.        
http://jgh.hunter.cuny.edu/index.php/component/content/article/6-biographies/95-owens-roland-a-phd.html?directory=18

These are my impressions of the meeting. Any and all mistakes, such as misrepresenting someone's words or sentiments, are all mine. And I welcome any corrections from others.

The agenda that Robert Miller originally set for us went smoothly. It was for a half hour meeting, but in the end we were given a full hour. First, Robert had the patients go around the large table and introduce ourselves, stating how long we have been, or our family member has been, ill. Then he read a statement which included points and issues he felt needed stressing. They focused on, but were not limited to, these two key points:

1. The need for trust building....In the past, our government offices (NIH, CDC) have acted in ways that has eroded our trust in them, from the (rather amorphous) decades of neglect to, most recently, the highly concrete fact that Dr.Judy Mikovits, the scientist who found the link between XMRV and CFS, was excluded from the XMRV Conference line up until patients loudly complained. Robert said that we now need our government to act in a way that engenders our trust in them.

2. The need for funding

Funding is needed for ME/CFS research, clinical trials, and Centers of Excellence (including WPI).

(For the full text of Robert's statement, see below.) 

After Robert made his very salient, well-written points, Dr. Peterson made a statement, and then three additional patients made theirs, each lasting about 2 minutes. (My statement is included below.) Honestly, embarrassingly, I can't recall any of them. Though I do recall feeling very proud to be on the same side as Dr. Peterson. And I do recall feeling very moved by the patients' statements. One woman, the mother of a long-time patient, made a strong plea for attention to pediatric CFS issues.

After Dr. Peterson and the patients' spoke, it was Dr. Michael Gottesman's turn. He told us that he had talked to Dr. Francis Collins just that morning, and that the NIH Director wanted us to know that positive things were going to happen. "We are on track. Things will happen." He did mention that NIAID is currently setting up multi-centered clinical trials.

After he talked, we the patients started with our questions. It was a 1 hr meeting, so there were many topics and I cannot recall all of them. They included (not necessarily in this order):

 - What power and purse strings Dr. Gottesman has as Deputy Director of Intramural Research. He was pointedly asked, Can you make a commitment to us right now for clinical trials? 

Answer: Dr. Gottesman explained that his department, Intramural Research, means research done within the NIH, not outside the NIH. Intramural Research is only 10% of the NIH budget. Intramural Research is where "higher risk" research can be done (I am not sure why he brought up that point, i.e. if it relates to us or not.) My impression was that he felt he did not have a lot of say in deciding on clinical trials. My impression was that he was at this meeting because Dir. Collins wanted someone high up to meet with us, but that Dir. Collins did not have the time (or inclination? Or knowledge of our needs?) to match the person we would meet with what our actual needs were. Others may have a different impression of the situation. Dr. Gottesman did say, in so many words, that the meeting was hastily arranged, and for the short time they had to arrange it, it was pretty good to get someone as high up as he. In terms of funding, he did say, "There will be more funding, and more publications."

- Patients pointedly asked why has this illness been ignored for 2+ decades. When Dr. Gottesman said it was due to a lack of concrete scientific, clinical and medical findings and published papers, patients countered that there are 5000 scientific and medical studies on CFS already published.

- When Dr. Gottesman said that Alter's paper was the first evidence of something concrete (i.e. a virus) for CFS, patients reminded him about Elaine DeFreitus and how her viral findings were ignored and even discredited by the CDC 19 yrs ago.

- Strangely, at least to us patients, Dr. Gottesman praised the former CFS point person Dr. Strauss, saying that both the NIH and CFS patients lost a good fighter for our cause when we lost Strauss. No patients nodded their heads in agreement. Dr. Gottesman also seemed "not to know" about the disappointment patients feel towards NIAID Director Fauci. So we told him we did not feel warm and fuzzy towards him for having ghettoized us to the Office of research for women's health (I don't recall their official name), which has no money.

- Dr. Gottesman noted how dangerous it is to take anti-retrovirals when we have not done clinical trials. And before clinical trials they need to test the meds in vitro. We patients responded with the fact that there are already two published studies on anti-retrovirals that work to hinder XMRV in vitro. (We sent these two studies to Dr. Gottesman via email after the meeting.) I think it was Dr. Peterson who talked about how patients are already doing anti-retrovirals. That that is how desperate we are.

- We talked about how if XMRV or related viruses are a dead end (i.e. not a cause of CFS, and not a cause of anything hurtful to the body), we hope their interest in CFS does not reach a dead end, too.

- Patients discussed the pathetic name our illness was given, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and how that very name has contributed to families abandoning their sick family members because of a disbelief that they are really sick.

- Dr. Gottesman talked about how respected Dr. Alter is and how Dr. Alter's interest in our illness and his published study will change everything for our illness. Alter, and his paper, carry a lot of weight.

- When the NIH team (Dr. Owens) said more people were needed to go into the field of CFS research, Dr. Peterson said there are many good doctors who are already working on this, but not getting funding. And patients stated that the lack of funding in general, for CFS, turns off potential researchers.

- Patients talked very concretely about how funding for CFS projects and research are selected and allocated, and how the team who approves CFS research grants is flawed (noting the dentists and psychologists who are included in the team, as opposed to more immunologists and CFS experts).

- Dr. Gottesman said that for our specific concrete greivences, we need to write a letter stating those grievances and concerns and send that to the Director Collins' office. He promised us that it will be addressed and forwarded to the right person within the Director's office. 
*****(If patients are willing to send emails to Director Collins, we ask you to select something from the list of points Bob raised in his statement, found below. Pick the one or two points that you feel most effects or moves you.)


- Most importantly, Dr. Gottesman said he'd meet with us again. And I think 3 months time was suggested. We said we'd like others involved in that meeting, perhaps others from the NIH who we might suggest, due to our specific needs. Any mistakes in this assessment of our meeting are all mine. There is a good chance there are many mistakes, as it was all taken in through exhaustion, brain fog and a poor memory.




Thanks to Robert Miller for organizing this meeting, to Dan Peterson for adding the weight of his years of experience and expertise. Thanks also to the amazing patients and family members who shared difficult stories of years lost to CFS, and to the NIH officials who took the time to meet with us and will hopefully meet with us again in the near future.

-- Summary by Rivka Solomon, with help from Robert Miller

________________________________________

Robert Miller's testimony at the NIH meeting, September 7, 2010 

My name is Robert Miller. I want to thank you for meeting with us today. We are particularly grateful for your work Dr. Lo and for Dr. Alters as well, and the PNAS publication. 

I have had CFS for all of the 25 years that it took the NIH to get to this point. And still, we are only at the beginning of understanding a retroviral role in my illness. 

INTROS

1. Trust Building: The PNAS paper was critical in confirming the Science study last fall which identified a retroviral association with CFS. But the fact that it almost wasna. Even with the first XMRV conference sponsored by NIH, starting today, the researchers that found the XMRV association in CFS were not going to be invited to speak until patients protested. b. So,we present this petition, even though the study was published, because the 1016 patients who signed this petition,and many more will be watching the NIH c. We are also delivering this second petition from P.A.N.D.O.R.A. (PATIENT ALLIANCE FOR NEUROENDOCRINEIMMUNE DISORDERS ORGANIZATION FOR RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY)with nearly 1600 signatures requesting a meeting with Secretary Sebelius to address the lack of funding for CFS/ME, and related illnesses. 

2. Funding.

NIH’s record of funding CFS research is near zero. Less than $2 per CFS patient per year. So patients are demanding that the NIH allocate at least $100 million dollars over the next two years to researching CFS, especially the family of retroviruses that you have now identified. 

a.  I’ve heard years of excuses at the CFSAC meetings from NIH representatives that not enough fundable proposals make it through your process. We know that right now you have a stimulus budget. We Say “Build it and They will come”. You have a huge opportunity right now to attract hundreds maybe thousands of proposals on this illness, and you need to be aggressive about it. That means changing the process, expediting the way proposals get reviewed and studies get funded, like you did with AIDS. 


b. There are many lessons from the AIDS epidemic that you published yourselves. [shown in the report]. One lesson is that funding early saves money in the future and certainly could prevent the spread of a debilitating virus. The book that gives an account of the politics behind HIV in America "And the Band Played On" describes Dr. Don Francis, then at the CDC, was turned down for $30 million in funding when he was desperately trying to prevent the spread of AIDS in 1985. That lack of early funding for HIV prevention cost the U.S. government $$$ Billions of Dollars later while addressing the HIV/AIDS epidemic, which we are still fighting.  

c.  We would not be here if the privately funded Whittemore Peterson Institute had not identified the connection between XMRV in cancer and the immune problems (RNASE L defect)in CFS patients. They had to know CFS patient histories to figure that out. That is why it is Key to have doctors like Dr. Daniel Peterson, Dr. Nancy Klimas, Dr. Anthony Komaroff and others working with NIH researchers. We need CFS Centers of Excellence funded by NIH. 

d. NIH and FDA need to drive a clinical trial process for treatments with the end goal of making safe and accessible treatments available as soon as possible. We are already experiencing the AIDS-effect of patients self-medicating with very serious medications, such as antivirals and anti-retrovirals, because many of us are desperately sick and there are no alternatives for CFS patients - none.   

a. I have participated in the only clinical trial approved by the FDA for CFS, the Ampligen (AMP-516 and AMP-511) study. I was on it 10 years ago, And I improved, the data showed efficacy, but still the FDA denied approval. After living in the DC area for 5 years, I had to up-root and move my 10-year old twin sons back to Reno, so that I could access Ampligen again, but yet To This day, I am still one of only a few patients with access to Ampligen. There is no excuse that there is only one trial in one city in the whole country to access the only treatment available. NIH needs to seed this process quickly, so patients have faith that FDA trials will bring them relief. The alternative is chaos like the early days of AIDS. 

 e. Lastly, children with CFS is a very troubling issue. Many recommendations have been made by CFSAC to address the obstacles to real pediatric care and coordination with educators and law enforcement. Children with CFS have to be part of the science. Your PNAS study also compels us to worry about passing this living torture to our children and spouses, and to worry whether every childhood cold will trigger what I have. What would you do if it were your child? 

While I am angry that it has taken decades to get here, I Still have Hope, Because, We are sitting here today, just prior to the First XMRV Conference and because the NIH has confirmed a breakthrough. 

Your speed and commitment will give us our lives back.

Thank you for allowing me to speak here today. 

-- Robert Miller ________ Rivka Solomon's testimony at the NIH meeting, September 7, 2010: 

In 1983, I was 21 when I got mono and never fully recovered. So one day I'm a straight A student leader, a mountain hiker, a global traveler, climbing the career ladder in int'l relations -- the next day I didn't have the strength to brush my teeth. Two decades later, I'm still bedridden and homebound much of the time. Two decades -- because my gov't and the medical community refused to believe my illness was real. Instead of taking me seriously, my illness was labeled "fatigue." The NIH ignored us, which was devastating. But the CDC did worse; They published studies saying CFS was an inability to handle stress, was due to childhood abuse or was an emotional imbalance. (Their most recent study saying this came out just last month.)

Last wk, 26 yrs after I got sick, my blood was tested and, yes, I have the human gamma retrovirus XMRV. My next step is to take dangerous anti-retroviral meds, even though, unfortunately, clinical trials have not been conducted.

I'm still bedridden much of the time; it will take me weeks to recover from the energy required for this meeting. But I am so glad to be here.

I am here to ask each of you, personally -- you (point or look at each NIH rep) -- to help me and the 1-4 million Americans with CFS that I represent today. 

- We want you to fund fast-track clinical trials for treatments, medications. - We want you to fund Centers of Excellence just for this illness, starting with the WPI in Reno, the folks who discovered this link between XMRV and CFS. 

We have spent the last few decades abandoned by our gov't. Abandoned. Please do what is right and help us. Now. Finally.

Lastly, I want to publicly thank Dr. Dan Peterson for believing us and for dedicating his life to us. And I want to thank my mother, who has stood by through the last 2 decades. (She was present at the meeting.) -- Rivka Solomon

________________________________________

Closing Note: In a post-meeting email exchange between Deputy Director Gottesman and CFS participant Rivka Solomon, Dr. Gottesman said he would be forwarding Rivka's 
"Dear Secretary Sebelius, Dear Director Collins" singing video to NIH Director Francis Collins. 
(Video found here: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8t1Xqp1LDxM ) 

MAY BE REPOSTED -- PLEASE DISTRIBUTE WIDELY  

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

#76~ NIH/FDA vindicates WPI paper= BooYah!



Latest Paper links 85% of ME/CFS patients with a form of Retrovirus !!

This is "one" of the days we've been waiting for... and it did NOT disappoint.
Here is a pdf copy of the Alter/Lo paper if you want to read the whole thing..
PNAS-2010-Lo-1006901107.pdf

As of this moment's count over 104+ articles have been written per Google by various new agencies/papers about this research Paper on the latest RETROVIRUS Family that is infecting HUMANS...a good number of them unfortunately tho seem to MISS the Major POINT Here.. that THIS is a Retrovirus... NOT just your average "I've got a cold" Rhinovirus.. 
Maybe they forgot HIV that caused AIDS is a RETROVIRUS ??

The NEXT Question is WHEN are they going to take it SERIOUSLY with regard to the "Public Blood Supply" and DEMAND that the blood supply be screened for this Family of Retroviruses so that every person about to "donate/receive" blood or receive a transfusion does NOT have to worry about passing on the Horrible Diseases that those of us for the last 24 years have suffered from... it may not kill you IMMEDIATELY Like AIDS, but Trust me, it WILL Kill your Life As YOU Knew it...

It is Progressive and can/will go on to cause other organs to fail and take your families energies, bankrupt bank accounts and any semblance of a "normal life" they had with it.

**************************************************************

Statement by Whittemore Peterson Institute
August 23, 2010

Statement on XMRV/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 
Positive replication study confirms WPI’s findings

The Whittemore Peterson Institute(WPI) would like to congratulate the distinguished authors of the recently released replication study linking XMRV with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Dr. Shyh‐Ching Lo of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Dr. Harvey Alter of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Their published findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), confirm the central thesis of WPI’s 2009 study associating a new human gamma retrovirus, XMRV, with patients diagnosed with myalgic
encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) while also providing answers for the failure of others to find such a link.


Validation by these prestigious researchers from two United States governmental agencies demonstrates the need for expanded research on human gamma retroviral infection and its association to ME/CFS and other neuro‐immune diseases.


“We are hopeful that with continued collaboration between our government, the biomedical industry and institutions such as the WPI, we will continue to discover answers for the millions around the world who suffer with neuro‐immune diseases,” said Annette Whittemore, president and founder of the Whittemore Peterson Institute. For additional thoughts by Dr. Judy Mikovits, please view (below).


The WPI is committed to the research and further understanding of XMRV and its
relationship to neuro-­immune disease. With the recent opening of the institute’s new translational research facilities located on the medical school campus of the University of Nevada, Reno, come expanded opportunities for new avenues of research and development of effective diagnostics and treatments for those affected by neuro-­immune disease.



http://www.wpinstitute.org/news/docs/WPI_pressrel_082310.pdf


Annette Whittemore


Dr Judy Mikovits


MORE Research is Needed NOW more than EVER so we don't have to go thru another Epidemic without the Research having been DONE when we KNOW we have the knowledge, the Scientific talent and the Drug companies are ready to alter their meds and start Trials ASAP... Please Help us Help YOU>

If you wish to Help:

*You can pass this article on to someone you know that NEEDS to know this info.

*You can pass this article on to someone that you feel would be in a position to Help us. 

*You can write a letter to the Dept of HHS and ask Sec Kathleen Sebelius to screen the country's blood supply ASAP for the family of the MRV Retroviruses.

*You can Help by even spreading the Word that a 3rd Retrovirus is OUT THERE or Rather IN OUR BLOOD and the Public needs to BE AWARE NOW....

*You can also be aware that there is a HUGE Difference between "chronic fatigue" and "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" aka ME/CFS myalgic encephalomyelitis.. that the CDC has Refused to ACKNOWLEDGE FOR 25+ YEARS... "as if diseases will Honor County borders.." in the rest of the world this is called M.E.

*You can also even if it's just $5 Help us by donating to the WPI...
The ONLY Place like this in the WORLD> Seriously !!! They need EVERY Penny for Research they can...They were the FIRST even w/o their building to make the First Breakthru on this illness, but this is ONLY the first skirmish... we have Far to GO...
http://www.wpinstitute.org/help/help_donation.html

In the last CENTURY the World has NEVER seen a facility like this built around the patient, with researchers, scientists and Dr's to treat the patients... This is HISTORY MAKING AND NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT cuz you KNOW "The Insurance Co" sure as heck aren't gonna pay for this... So PLease check this out and then collect those pennies, nickels, dimes, dollars and whatever you can gather.. any kind of Fund Raiser you can think of...PLEASE....
Do I need to tell you HOW many children also have this illness ?? 
You would be crying and not be able to read this blog. Seriously ....

This is what we have been working HARD for and This Building JUST OPENED last weekend... so they are just beginning..

Without your Help EVERYTHING will take LONGER....and Retroviruses 
spread Fast and do NOT discriminate against age, sex or profession.

The NEW WPI Facility~



The 17million (so far) around the World ♥THANK YOU♥


Wednesday, August 18, 2010

#75~ The Ribbon is CUT at WPI.

The Ribbon  has been CUT on the REAL Game Changer.


“We have immune system profiles and we can tell by the immune system how the XMRV is doing the damage,” she said. “So we could have a diagnostic test to follow clinical treatment and show that people’s immune systems go back to normal. That’s the latest data that’s really amazing. That’s what we’re after.”
                                          ~ per Dr Judy Mikovits







Press Release from WPI ~


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 16, 2010


The Whittemore Peterson Institute Celebrates Formal Dedication of New Building
Innovative research facility to offer unique collaboration of science and medical treatment

Reno, Nev. – Today, the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) celebrated the completion of its new facility at the Center for Molecular Medicine. 

The WPI is the first institute in the world to integrate research, education and treatment of neuro-­immune diseases. Located at the University of Nevada, Reno, the $77 million facility is the result of an innovative partnership funded by a combination of University Research grants, private contributions to the WPI, 
and public funding from the state of Nevada. The new WPI facilities, set to open in fall 2010, include executive and administrative offices, research and clinical labs and a medical clinic.

“The completion of this building is the realization of a dream and a beacon of hope for patients affected with neuro-­immune 

diseases,” said Annette Whittemore, president and founder of the Whittemore Peterson Institute. 

”Our strategic partnership with the University, combined with this dynamic setting gives us confidence that the research done here will translate into innovative medical care for patients around the globe. We are proud that our work will soon lead to new avenues of research and treatment for these diseases.”

Monday’s program included a reception for donors, government officials, and personal friends of the institute and University, followed by brief presentations on the topics of higher education, University and WPI research, and the
significance of this new medical research building.


Speakers included U.S. Senators Harry Reid and John Ensign, U.S. Representatives Shelley Berkley and Dean Heller, State Senator William Raggio, University President Milton Glick and Annette Whittemore.


“The WPI’s comprehensive medical program will bring together physicians, nurses, technicians, state-­of-­the-­art equipment and other resources to provide an incomparable suite of medical services and information.” said Mike Hillerby, director of operations at the Whittemore Peterson Institute. “This facility will offer a unique setting where medical care, clinical laboratory testing and research can be integrated to develop effective treatments for patients suffering from chronic debilitating diseases.”

The Whittemore Peterson Institute will hold an invitation-­only scientific symposium on Tuesday, August 17, bringing together leading researchers, clinicians, and key collaborators from the medical and research community to
discuss the latest XMRV research findings, medical research data and evaluate treatment outcomes since the publication of their 2009 XMRV study.
The symposium organized by the Whittemore Peterson Institute, entitled
XMRV in Human Disease, will be led by WPI Director of Research, Dr. Judy Mikovits.


On August 21, the University and WPI will host an open house at the Center for Molecular Medicine from 10a.m. to noon. The event will be open to the public and will include tours of the new facilities. Researchers and representatives of the Whittemore Peterson Institute and University of Nevada School of Medicine will
be on hand to discuss the new facility and its ongoing research.

For additional information about the Whittemore Peterson Institute and for a list
of upcoming news and events, please visit http://www.wpinstitute.org.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

#74~ The Politics and Science of Blood~FDA Style

Informal Report from the FDA's Blood Safety Advisory Committee Meeting

"It’s All About the Prostate, Folks."
Reprinted with the permission of the author 
Heidi Dunlap Bauer.
reported ~ July 26, 2010


I’m sure there will be much more reporting regarding the FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee meeting from today, but since I did make the effort to attend, I thought I would try to report as best as I can from my experience. My plan was first to tape Dr. Judy Mikovits speaking. I was under the impression that she would be allowed to speak somehow at the last minute. I had planned on taking a camcorder, but decided against it and took a voice recorder instead. I didn’t even use that though because all slides were copied onto handouts to be picked up at the door. The room was huge and filled with scientists, press and very few patient advocates, or at least very few who used the public time to speak. Kim McCleary was there, but I recognized few familiar faces aside from Wanda Jones. Even in the fourth row back from front, I was half a room away from the committee. This was far different than the CFSAC meetings I’ve attended with their cozy, cramped storage rooms. I was fortunate enough to see Dr. Mikovits enter and forced myself over to greet her and introduce myself. She graciously allowed me to glue myself to her for support, meaning she allowed me to sit with her during the meeting. I found out quickly that there were no accommodations made last minute for her to speak. She was sent to be a presence in the audience, and I hoped, a reminder that the good guys are still vigilant about our government finally getting this right.


The chair, Blaine Hollinger, M.D., opened with a statement I had previously read in an email. He stressed that the XMRV portion was information only and no recommendations or decisions would be made during this meeting. This seemed reasonable given that it was being videoed by the FDA along with a transcript being released eventually. My general impression afterwards is that this was simply a show for the public, a nice, safe, production meant to dispel “public panic” and focus almost solely on Prostate Cancer when XMRV was mentioned. To me, it is still reprehensible that prostate cancer (PC) receives respectful nods of approval and NIH funding when they have at best a 23% positive XMRV rate, and they only have found that in a highly specific type of PC that affects young men with a particularly aggressive form of PC. Add to that not even one replication study that backs those figures up (plus a couple negative studies) and they are in a worse situation than the Science study, which had a 67% positive rate, 95% with improved assays, and has a positive replication study pending publication. Yet, it is all about the prostate.


First up was Dr. Indira Hewlett. She presented an overview of the upcoming speakers and topics - three positive studies, including the Science paper, Silverman’s work and the German study, which found XMRV in respiratory secretions. Then the several negative papers are mentioned. As scientific courtesy dictates, the possible reasons for discrepant findings were listed, including the study populations, geographic differences, and “other unknown factors”. I mentally inserted, power, money, and politics as the “unknown” factors.


Dr. Silverman spoke next and disclosed his affiliations with Abbott Laboratories as both his research support and patent licensing and consulting. I’m going to move on past this one since there was nothing new presented here. I have read about that paper much too often. I’m starting to think I’ve read too much in general, because over 50% of the topics and slides were familiar information to me.  

Next, was Dr. Peter Ganz of Health Canada. Overall, they are not convinced that XMRV is the cause of ME/CFS, but they have employed what he called “Regulatory Perspectives” meaning “Lack of consensus does not require adherence to the status quo” and “What are the potential risks to blood recipients?” He called for further studies to establish XMRV as the underlying cause of human diseases in infected individuals. Hear, hear! Get the assays right, fund the studies and get on with it already. Prove the causative aspect so we can move on to answering the dozens of other questions this discovery brings about. How about - How is it transmitted exactly? How does it reach the brain? Is one person more at risk than another? What determines severity? All I could think of is what a waste of time this all is when researchers could, and SHOULD, already be in their labs, well funded, to hammer out the details. And, give the majority of the money to the WPI while I’m making my wish list. If anyone can pull a miracle out of a shoestring budget, they can. They’ve done it before.


Dr. Michael Hendry from the CDC study was up next. We all know the paper. We all know the Publisher’s Clearing House manner of patient selection used. If my cat could speak and answer a phone in Georgia or Kansas, I’m sure he would have been chosen for the study, providing that he could also pull off being female. Sometimes I’m surprised it’s the mouse and not the cat that XMRV derives from. Cats seem to naturally have the CDC version of a fatiguing illness. I was happy to see Dr. Suzanne Vernon pull the CDC paper apart quite well with a critical blow toward the CDC assuring patients this was a study designed NOT to find XMRV. No one expected anything other than that, of course. At least, no one with both eyes open. Dr. Vernon’s emphatic statement also leads me to believe the tides are changing. Compared to the harsh, critical blows Dr. Vernon gave to the Science paper early on, none of which could find fault with the virology, only a harping on the need for more patient information, her attack of the CDC paper at least momentarily could lead one to believe she is aligning herself with the burgeoning group of believers that XMRV is strongly linked with ME/CFS and is likely causative.


The worst part of Dr. Hendry’s presentation for me was after it was over. We are used to the lying, the manipulation and the sheer audacity to give false information as though they are facts. But, when asked by Dr. Hollinger if the PCR gag was the same as the Lombardi study, he said “Yes.” A bold faced lie. It’s one thing to read about these moments, but it’s quite another to see the lying in person, not to mention the slight swagger of Dr. Hendry as he walked back to his seat. It was during the questioning that Dr. Mikovits rose up to answer a question that I unfortunately missed. Dr. Hendry’s one slide had written on it “Developed sensitive mouse sequence specific qPCR to detect contamination with mouse DNA. XMRV positive DNA samples tested for mouse contamination.” Dr. Mikovits stood up and made sure everyone knew that these were sequenced and isolated. All 20 samples sent by the WPI were confirmed positives. It was hard to judge by body language what the reaction was. I kept looking over at Coffin though, who is so easy to pick out with the beard, hoping he’d ask a question or get involved. This meeting seemed to be about keeping things stiff and calm though. I half expected the Queen of England to show up with that much composure to go around. But, the only one deserving of a royal title in my book is Dr. Mikovits and she wasn’t even invited to speak. I was happy she was there as a reminder to all who the queen bee really is in the XMRV game.


And, so we continue and see Dr. Hewlett appear again with information on the assays they are using. I really need to sit down and talk with someone soon about assay development to understand that all better. Right now, I simply trust that Dr. Mikovits and Dr. Frank Ruscetti know what they are doing better than anyone else in the world, because as of yet, good assays seem to be eluding most scientists. I kept thinking, Judy’s made this insanely easy for them. She says here, try this. It will work. They say, no. We’ll do it our way hoping we can trump you. So, basically, there is still a problem with assays. Period. Then why, please, would Dr. Hewlett want to examine HIV patients in Cameroon and Uganda with an assay that has yet to be proven? Why would the other study that searched for XMRV in over 560 HIV+ patients in Chicago use an ineffective assay as well? Not one HIV+ patient in either study had XMRV. I’m fine with that if that is true. An HIV patient doesn’t need another hit like XMRV. However, with 4% of the healthy population carrying XMRV, does it not seem likely that at least a few HIV patients would be able to contract it as well? I’m not a scientist though, but I’d like to make sure my tax money goes to the right place to find those answers out. In my dreams I think of filling out my next tax form and seeing a place that says, “Would you like to donate $3 to WPI?”


Next up was the Blood XMRV Scientific Research Working Group report by Graham Simmons. This group has just about all the names we are familiar with and then some: Harvey Alter, Jerry Holmberg, Frank Ruscetti, Roger Dodd (you remember him from the May transcripts referring to the “perception” of an XMRV emergency rather than a real emergency), Suzanne Vernon, Judy Mikovits, John Coffin, Shyh-Ching Lo, Bill Switzer, etc. Presently, the main thrust of this group seems to be to find agreement on an effective assay. Graham Simmons concluded that "the study was too small to conduct meaningful statistical comparisons" and "more work on analytical panel development will need to be performed." The main labs in this group are WPI, FDA (Lo), FDA (Hewlett), NCI and BSRI.

Last up and the most interesting to me was the man with the Scottish accent, Dr. Stuart Le Grice. He said their goal is to create a group of 6 assays (Viral, DNA, RNA, Western blot serological (antibodies), serological (antibodies) and immunihistochemistry) that they are completely satisfied with and then go head to head with other assays to compare. If I’m not mistaken, he talked about a need to find XMRV directly from the sample as opposed to growing it in a cell line. I might have to wait for the transcripts to make sure of that one, but that seems like a fairly important leap in assay development.


I was impressed by one of his first slides:

"X-SCA: Single Copy XMRV DNA or RNA Detection – HIV DRP

Current status:

72 blinded samples of donor plasma, spiked with known quantities of XMRV DNA or RNA were tested using the X-SCA assay

*XMRV detected with SINGLE COPY sensitivity
*XMRV detected in plasma and whole blood with 100% accuracy
*No false positives or negatives"


It’s good to hear someone finally say they can find XMRV with this sort of accuracy. I often feel scientists are playing hide and seek for XMRV with their hands over their eyes saying, “I can’t find you.” In regards to a viral assay, which I believe looks for viral load, they have reduced the time on this to 3 days, and announced that there is information coming down the pipeline that it is now 1-2 days. The name of this assay is Viral DERSE (der’-see). All I could say is, “Wow!” I pictured the future where patients go to the doctor to find out if the retroviral is working and the test they got two days ago, covered by insurance (I dream big), gives an accurate picture for the doctor to consider. I’m not sure if I’m right or wrong on being impressed, but I caught Dr. Mikovits nodding quite a lot, so I must not be too far off.


And, so ended my four hour stay in Gaithersburg. After two brief public comments, one by an HIV patient and another by a CFS patient who calmly took 30 seconds to ask that the Alter paper be released, we were let go for lunch. I had no interest in their talk on Babesia. I hope it went well. At least this time the agenda didn’t have it pitted against XMRV as though it has to be a choice. I’m unsure if I will return to another FDA Blood Advisory meeting, but I am happy I went this time. I appreciate the friends who wished me well and wanted to hear my report. Thank you for reading and your continued support through this journey we’re all on. We strengthen each other every day just by being available. I hope we all continue to spread that support to the WPI and specifically to Judy and Annette, women we have assumed a first name basis with because of our appreciation for their sacrifice and dedication to ending our suffering. They are truly women of truth and integrity, and they deserve so much better than what they have received at the hands of the media, science and our government. They will win though. It’s imminent. 
*******************************


I would like to add my personal Immense Gratitude to Heidi for attending and being able to come home and write up such a Fantastic detailed and realistic report for us all to comprehend. She is truly a Gem and I was SO Happy that she was able to sit next to Dr. Judy Mikovits. Thanks for helping keep the patients and public informed in a timely manner.  There simply is not enough ways  for us to show our Appreciation to you for taking upon this task and following it up with your wonderful report back to us. Bless you !!!






Saturday, July 3, 2010

#73~ CDC-XMRV (not) paper ~ WPI responds

Research Science badmitton? What the heck??
Science paper: ping pong, tennis, golf, whatever is NOT what this is supposed to be about..
This is a time for Serious Research Science NOT game playing.



This is REALLY getting OLD... 
IMHO, I believe that when Reeves left the CFS Dept, that he took or buried the samples of XMRV so they would never be discovered at the CDC. Reeves even SAID~ while he was still in charge of the CFS Dept of the CDC, that he "didn't expect to find XMRV" ~ duh yeah... 
even when it's sent to YOU ?? He either has NO brain cells or is INTENTIONALLY using another definition and testing methods so that he/they will NEVER find them as he states...

Hum... SURE sounds like a cover up and he must have buried the evidence before he left the Dept to me.. but WAIT... is that his name I SEE on the NEW Paper ????


This bumbling group that is "suppose to be" OUR Center for Disease Control
can't even find XMRV when it is "Handed to Them." HOW Dense are they?

Can anyone say ~ 
"Intentional Cover-up," 
"History is being repeated,"
"the band plays on"...
anything ringing a bell yet?


And mind you.. this is NOT ONLY about ME/CFS... This is NOW a "Public Health" issue because of all of the donated blood for the last 25 years that has contaminated the public blood supply ALL over the World that now has XMRV in it... Hello !!!


We REALLY need the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
Sec. Kathleen Sebelius to "reign in" the CDC and to do some "house cleaning"
over there and make them a source of Pride not a National Embarrassment and a Public Health HAZARD.


PLEASE write to her and Sen. Harry Reid and ask them to form a 'Congressional Committee' to find out what the heck they are doing over there with the samples they are being sent and WHAT kind of Research they are doing if the WPI, the Cleveland Clinic, the National Cancer Institute, NIH and FDA "can" FIND XMRV but the CDC can't...???  

They are proving themselves to be absolutely NOT Trustworthy and there Needs to be a Congressional Investigation about their inept behavior. They are NOT conducting themselves with Integrity and are certainly "covering-UP" something... and it smells rotten for sure.

We have written to them since we first sent the Obama-Biden Transition paper in after they were elected. so we need to keep this IN FRONT OF THEM...


Even the CFIDS Association, Dr Suzanne Vernon said the CDC was NOT looking for XMRV... and "That's saying a mouthful."


They are wasting our precious tax dollars and NOT finding what is handed to them.. Are they Ignorant, Dumb, Blind, or what's their excuse de jour?


Ask them AGAIN to "change" the CDC definition of CFS and to NOT use the Fakuda, but the Canadian definition...We have already presented the CFSAC with the petition that was signed by thousands of people. We do NOT want them to Widen the definition and test folks that are only depressed or tired.. that is NOT the population that they are suppose to be testing.....THAT is NOT ME/CFS..

We the People "will NOT Tolerate this grade school chemistry" from the CDC any more.. PERIOD. 


Please write to the First Lady Michelle Obama also and to Senator Harry Reid and to Sec of HHS Kathleen Sebelius..


First Lady Michelle Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500-0004


The Honorable Harry Reid
United States Senate
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-2803



Kathleen Sebelius
The U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W
Washington, D.C. 20201

email: Kathleen.Sebelius@hhs.gov

 

*** If you do NOT wish to snailmail them and WISH them to be DIRECTLY Handed to Sen. Harry Reid and he will take them back to Wash. D.C. and "make SURE" they are given to the Proper person... Then you may write your letters and email them to Andrea Whittemore and she WILL hand them to him Personally !!! and we will hand him buckets of Letters that should make a GREAT Impact, so Please start writing and editing your wording until you have exactly what you want to say and then by the end of July we shall be ready to send these ALL to Andrea and Make an IMPACT back in Wash DC when the Congress comes back into session, as the NIH is holding the 1st International XMRV Workshop over Labor Day weekend, and the next CFSAC meeting will be taking place so the HHS "will be" paying attention to what is going on.. and This would be the Perfect time for Sen. Harry Reid to see if he can get a Congressional Hearing called depending on just HOW BAD things roll out this summer..during the summer Retroviral paper show..don't forget your caramel popcorn to enjoy the show while you take your notes..


The Senate is on July 4th and summer Break soon... so we are working for "Maximum Impact" here.. so the more letters we can give him "at ONCE" the Bigger our Impact will be.. so watch the Insulting non-science show this summer of the CDC and write you letters and then get them to Andrea to hand to Sen Reid personally when WPI "OPENS their Doors", as they are in Nevada~ HE will be in attendance.. So PLEASE help us get these letters TO him DIRECTLY, OK? Seriously !!!

 ****************************************

Here is the WPI's response to the new CDC paper~

Whittemore Peterson Institute Statement regarding
Centers for Disease Control XMRV Study


Contrary to the WPI study published in Science in October, 2009, as well as studies done by
others, including the NIH and FDA, Mr. William Switzer of the Centers for Disease Control reported
that his research team was unable to detect XMRV in CFS patient samples. This negative finding is in
contrast to the WPI study in which we detected XMRV in 67% of CFS patient samples.


To correctly replicate scientific studies it is imperative that researchers use the same methods and patient criteria to ensure accurate results. The methodology used by the CDC was not the same as that used in the WPI study nor was the patient selection criteria. In September 2009, WPI sent the CDC twenty confirmed positive samples and the appropriate methodology to help them develop a clinically validated test. However, this team chose not to do this.


Until researchers use clinically validated tests to detect XMRV in patient samples, as WPI and their collaborators have successfully done, an accurate association of XMRV to any diseased population cannot be made. For this reason, WPI researchers and many others are currently validating more sensitive clinical assays to assist federal agencies in their search for the true prevalence of XMRV in the human population.


WPI will continue its core mission to deliver answers to patients with neuro-immune diseases by supporting the development of accurate diagnostics and providing effective therapeutics and clinical care.

http://www.wpinstitute.org/news/docs/XMRV-CDC%20Statementrevisedawfinalawfinal.pdf

********************************
As we need to find out who "all over the world has XMRV and who doesn't" and screen the world's blood supply... this is a BIG deal.


It does NOT matter what illness/cancer this retrovirus is linked to or causes...
The Research that is Done needs to be Legitimate and Accurate and they need to be using the same methods and samples. ONLY then will we get consistent results and then move on to researching what else these folks have picked up and sort them out from those that don't have it and look for the causes of the other Neuro Immune Diseases.. 

I have also just read a report that even claims that Narcolepsy is probably an Immune Disease. 

The repercussions are endless.. but the testing has to be flawless and Legit for us to make progress at all...

Please write your letters AND also ask everyone you know to support the ONLY "current place" that is NOT a Gov't agency and is a non-profit working ONLY to help us with Legitimate Science....aka the WPI.

http://www.wpinstitute.org/help/help_donation.html 


Also, Please write your Thank You notes to Dr Dan 
Peterson, ASAP~ 
so we can present them to him in a creatively hand made scrapbook 
form graciously made by Lisa at the WPI Gala... 
so send those notes in, so she has time to put the whole thing together, OK? Thanx
I sent mine 2 nights ago... The Gala will be after the
XMRV - NIH Conference, after the CFSAC and will be after WPI 's Official Opening..
so we HOPE it to be a GRAND Night... see the "previous post" about the Event.

Bless you WPI and everyone there....